When Wall Street money starts to flows in one direction, it is usually because there is a purpose. The indicator –money- usually follows the coffers of the candidate that uses a series of nuances that are not fully promises but strong enough signals to be a worth while investment.
In the present election cycle Wall Street money is following one direction, and it is the di-rection of Senator Clinton and Senator Schumer Senatorial Campaign.

Since Senator’s Clinton announcement of her bid for the presidency, I said that she will do what President Bush could not with Social Security, that is a parallel privatization of Social Security and create a mandated medical coverage even if the individual chooses no to have one.
Senator Schumer is on board to spin the privatization in the next presidency.
Both senators have already said that they will not support the actualization of taxes for Hedge Fund managers. After, seven debates and hundreds of public appearances the Social Security stance of Senator Clinton is becoming clear and her opponents see her position in the issue opening towards to privatization. The Senator has dodged the answers that will indicate that she is not going to follow the path of privatizing any part of the system.
Senator Barrack Obama is sizing the opportunity of the weakness of Senator Clinton to open the door to go full frontal for an answer and he is shouting “She's not alone in ducking the issue of social Security Privatization," Mr. Obama said. "Because conventional thinking in Washington says . . . you should hedge and dodge and spin, but at all costs, don't answer…He said candidates owed it to voters to explain how they would plug a looming cash shortfall in the government-funded pension scheme."

This might not play well with many democrats but the reality is that Senator Clinton is following the path of what Chairman Greenspan said about her husband “President Clinton is one of the best Republican presidents.” Book that line for posterity.